> I'm still skeptical of your supposed two week 500 heights forecast from the ECMWF model. You're probably right to be skeptical, for the record I was only a f

> I'm still skeptical of your supposed two week 500 heights forecast from the ECMWF model. You're probably right to be skeptical, for the record I was only a forecaster for a short period of time over ten years ago... didn't even serve my full four year commitment as I volunteered to get out under the Air Force "force shaping" at the time. I was stationed near Rammstein and we created forecasts for Europe. I was referring to the ECMWF ensemble products, specifically.