4 ms·
> Billionaire says something people disagree with "That's just the ramblings of a greedy, out-of-touch asshole who should be taxed down to 0 to atone for their
by mi100hael 7y ago
> Billionaire says something people disagree with
"That's just the ramblings of a greedy, out-of-touch asshole who should be taxed down to 0 to atone for their sins."
> Billionaire says something people agree with
"Our idea is validated! Someone who is very rich and successful concurs!"
- deogeo 7y agoJournalists wouldn't waste so much ink - just use 'claims' for one, and 'admits' for the other.
- PhasmaFelis 7y agoIt's easier to trust someone who's speaking against their own interests.
- hervature 7y agoExcept he already has his billions and has sold his company. Thus his only 'speaking against his own interest' is estate tax which is easily avoidable with preparation.
- PhasmaFelis 7y agoLet me rephrase, then. It's harder to trust someone who's obviously speaking exclusively for his own interests.