3 ms·
He published evidence of political corruption. It's a good thing he did it too so that US voters could make a fully informed decision about the candidates.
by malvosenior 7y ago
He published evidence of political corruption. It's a good thing he did it too so that US voters could make a fully informed decision about the candidates.
- gamblor956 7y agoHe published altered and forged documents alleging corruption, where said documents were provided by the Russian intelligence agencies for the sole purpose of influencing the US presidential election. And Assange, knowing this, attempted to coordinate the release of these falsified documents with the Trump administration. While also prohibiting Wikileaks from publishing any negative documents about Trump.
- malvosenior 7y agoThere is no evidence that those emails were falsified or forged. Even the participants didn't dispute their validity. The story is that Hillary was colluding with the DNC and the mainstream media, not that someone you don't like let everyone know about it.