5 ms·
When employees at the FDA leave and take positions at one of the companies they had a hand in approving something for, at an increased salary. The appearance of
by geggam 7y ago
When employees at the FDA leave and take positions at one of the companies they had a hand in approving something for, at an increased salary. The appearance of impropriety is blatant.
Regardless of it actually happening or not it looks terrible. This should never happen
- gumby 7y ago> Regardless of it actually happening or not it looks terrible. This should never happen I understand the problem you're describing, but consider what you're asking for: people with competence and experience should be barred from taking jobs that require competence and experience? Non-competes have the same problem.
- evandijk70 7y agoI am not in this field, but I guess that as an employee at the FDA you approve drugs for all the big pharma companies, which aside from the FDA are the major employers that value their skillset. It may be that if you prohibit FDA employees to transition to one of the big pharma companies, you're telling them that they can either work at the FDA forever or have to leave their field
- geggam 7y agoYes, there is a price to pay for being a public servant.
- Fomite 7y agoYou realize they're not actually servants, right? "Take a job with the Fed, sign up for a lifetime of lower income so that HN can nod sagely about avoiding the appearance of impropriety" is a recipe to get no one to ever work for the government.
- geggam 7y agoThe attitude they aren’t servants to the public is part of the problem
- gumby 7y ago“Hand in approving” is an important factor: approval is such a complex process no one person is really decisive, except possibly at the very very beginning. Drug companies used to hire multiple trucks simply to deliver their submissions.