4 ms·
1. The band had a 3rd party digitize some old tapes. 2. Someone at that 3rd party copied and leaked the data. 3. One of the recipients (or the leaker) posed a
by LeifCarrotson 7y ago
1. The band had a 3rd party digitize some old tapes.
2. Someone at that 3rd party copied and leaked the data.
3. One of the recipients (or the leaker) posed as Hoserama and tried to extort/sell/release them for $$$.
4. The band chose to release them for $, undercutting the fake.
- StavrosK 7y agoThat clarifies it, thanks. I missed a lot, I must have not read the article entirely.
- toyg 7y ago> Someone at that 3rd party copied and leaked the data. Or someone broke into the 3rd party infrastructure and made out with the data. Music-related businesses are not exactly renowned for their cybersecurity standards. We'll probably never know.
- hoorayimhelping 7y agoNumber 2 is pure speculation and you should mention that instead of passing it off as fact.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- LeifCarrotson 7y agoSorry, too late to edit. You're right, much of this (all three points?) are speculation/hearsay/guesses. I'm just summarizing what's been reported, I don't have any special inside information.
- redlorryyellow 7y ago3. is incorrect. the leaker wasn't trying to extort, he was trying to sell individual tracks. He then just released the whole thing online, posing as Hoserama, to try and save face. So we have had the leaks for over a week now.