I don't think that's a fair characterization. The linked article is a "Times Insider" article, so an article about the reporting that went into a much longer ar

I don't think that's a fair characterization. The linked article is a "Times Insider" article, so an article about the reporting that went into a much longer article. It focuses on the difficulties the reporter had researching the topic, and I don't think that any of it is fear-mongery like your all-caps title. The article whose reporting this one focuses on [0] is quite long and strikes me as being well-researched, thorough in its explanations, and not over the top in its take on the issue. Sure, there's a little bit of intrigue, but that just makes for interesting reading. [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/06/health/drug-resistant-candida-auris.html?module=inline https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/06/health/drug-resistant-can...