3 ms·
Granted, you're basically right; but still reads as biased to me. What if they replaced terms like "narcotics traficking" with "drug purchases?" What if they
by wallace_f 7y ago
Granted, you're basically right; but still reads as biased to me.
What if they replaced terms like "narcotics traficking" with "drug purchases?"
What if they changed "authorities" to "creeps with badges stalking ordinary people for buying drugs?"
Remember when the Panama Papers were leaked... And nothing happened?
Our taxpayer dollars are diverted to this crusade and so shouldn't we just call it what it is?
- nyolfen 7y ago"this is good journalism, reporting solid facts without unnecessary skew and invective" "yes, but what if we used skew and invective instead"
- rolltiide 7y ago(a lot happened with the Panama and Paradise Papers, most of it was benign, some of it had consequences for people whether laws were or weren't broken for those people)
- rolltiide 7y agoI understand, some things won't gain consensus today so its more productive to report what is happening and this article is much closer to that