4 ms·

Because there's like 674 ads on the linked page (if you're not running ad blocker)

• Rafuino 7y ago
  The article OP linked to has 24 trackers blocked by uBlock Origin, where the original source has 8 trackers blocked. Either way, get an ad blocker, I suppose, but we should read the original source wherever possible to support the actual journalism
  • malux85 7y ago
    I have an ad blocker, I turned it off to see the predicted mess underneath. And yes, 674 was an exaggeration, it's called hyperbole
    • randcraw 7y ago
      Using Perfect Web Browser on iPad (the best ad blocker I know for iOS), the site blocks my access completely. So the number of web-malignancies on the site may as well be infinite.
  • red_phone 7y ago
    Reading the original source with an ad blocker installed may not be providing as much support as you imagine.