3 ms·
They city of SF has said Bird can't layoff any Scoot employees if they want to take over Scoot's permit. >Among the conditions SFMTA asked of Bird is one Scoo
by bruceb 7y ago
They city of SF has said Bird can't layoff any Scoot employees if they want to take over Scoot's permit.
>Among the conditions SFMTA asked of Bird is one Scoot employees may be >celebrating: Reiskin told Bird it must maintain the “same or greater number of >employees that Scoot has employed during the pilot” to also operate at the “same >or higher” compensation, including benefits, and to maintain Scoot’s commitment >to labor harmony in San Francisco.
https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/formerly-ousted-e-scooter-company-bird-purchases-rival-scoot-and-acquires-sf-permit-in-the-process/ https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/formerly-ousted-e-scoote...
Not sure how enforceable this is.
- arcticbull 7y agoEnforcement action can be as simple as not issuing a permit renewal when this one expires.
- Stryder 7y agoWould be great to see if this one sticks, but I have a sneaking suspicion that managers will just find novel ways to get people to leave.
- sulam 7y agoThis does not say you can't lay someone off. What it says is that you can't RIF the team. You can fire people and hire others, possibly much cheaper others. IOW, this is a very weak requirement.
- eridius 7y agoYou can't hire cheaper others because of the "same or higher compensation" bit. The only reason to fire anyone from Scoot is if they're genuinely not good at their job and you can replace them with someone who performs better at the same pay.
- rhizome 7y ago"Unenforceable" under what principle or flaw?