>I don't see anything in the Facebook privacy policy that I wouldn't expect a high school student to be able to comprehend. I think, vocabulary wise, yes. High

>I don't see anything in the Facebook privacy policy that I wouldn't expect a high school student to be able to comprehend. I think, vocabulary wise, yes. High school students should be able to read each word. The problem is context and impact. Can the reader not only read the words, but understand them in the context of the entire document as well as in the context of their usage? For example: >"[...]we collect information from and about the computers, phones, connected TVs and other web-connected devices you use that integrate with our Products, and we combine this information across different devices that you use." The words are easy to read. The meaning, however, is not. Most people don't take the time to learn how severe of an impact aggregating data has. It seems harmless to share two pieces of non-PII, until you learn that two pieces of non-PII may become PII when aggregated. The test by Lexile claims to measure complexity, not just the legibility. However, I haven't looked into the test that much and don't have an opinion on its accuracy. That said, I don't think the average person can _understand_ the documents, even if they can read the words - which is the same conclusion reached in the parent article: >"Even policies that are shorter and easier to read can be impenetrable, given the amount of background knowledge required to understand how things like cookies and IP addresses play a role in data collection."