4 ms·
ArXiv vs. SnarXiv (2010)
- dang 7y agoDiscussed a bit at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1411359 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1411359
- nategri 7y agoTook a year of grad level particle physics and I only managed 16/20, haha.
- microcolonel 7y agoBatting four for four, not sure what that means though, because I actually don't know what I'm trying to classify.
- BlueTemplar 7y ago"- If you’re a graduate student, gloomily read through the abstracts, thinking to yourself that you don’t understand papers on the real arXiv any better. - If you’re a post-doc, reload until you find something to work on. - If you’re a professor, get really excited when a paper claims to solve the hierarchy problem, the little hierarchy problem, the mu problem, and the confinement problem. Then experience profound disappointment. - If you’re a famous physicist, keep reloading until you see your name on something, then claim credit for it." XD
- p1esk 7y agoI would like something like this for deep learning papers.
- tanderson92 7y agoThat's even easier: https://arxiv.org/ https://arxiv.org/
- iamcreasy 7y agoHighest score was 'undergrad'. This thing is rage inducing.