3 ms·

I've been doing the same but I haven't quiet been able to find good replacements for gmail and hangouts. Anyone have any recommendations? For gmail I'd like re

by bbatha 7y ago

I've been doing the same but I haven't quiet been able to find good replacements for gmail and hangouts. Anyone have any recommendations? For gmail I'd like real imap and custom domain support. FastMail is the obvious choice, but I can't in good conscious trust an Australian company with my secrets.[0] Hangouts: I'd like cross platform with a web client if possible. I would like optional chat history sync. And I'd like on by default encryption. Signal is great, but its treatment of chat history is too paranoid to be useful for everyday conversations. Whatsapp is also a strong contender, but I'd also prefer to stay off facebook services. edit: for a hangouts replacement, I'm not looking for video/audio chats I'm looking for a direct messaging focused service that can serve as an SMS replacement along the lines of iMesseges, whatsapp or signal. And yes I know about XMPP I was a heavy user a decade ago, but I'd prefer not to replace a dying service with a dying protocol. 0: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/12/australia-passes-new-law-to-thwart-strong-encryption/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/12/australia-passes...

ocdtrekkie 7y ago
The hubbub about the article there is FUD, particularly when it comes to FastMail. Since FastMail isn't an end-to-end encrypted service (Gmail isn't either), laws about thwarting encryption are entirely irrelevant: Both must respond to a legal government order for your information. Google responds to many tens of thousands of these requests yearly: https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/overview?t=table https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/overview?t=t... If you are not Australian, the likelihood of getting your data subpoena'd from an Australian company is pretty low. If you're in the US, it's far more likely for your Gmail data to be successfully subpoena'd. Unless you belong to a fairly narrow set of people, the risk of government access to your data is relatively low. Meanwhile, the threat of advertiser access to your data is high for everyone: Don't trust an ad company with your data, even if they currently say they won't use it for ads.
- bbatha 7y ago
  I'm not trying to compare gmail and fastmail. I'm trying get off gmail, and that is the top priority. However, changing email providers is relatively disruptive and I'd prefer to choose one that can last me 5-10 years. Fastmail was that choice but uncertainty about Australian encryption laws throws a wrench into that equation. My concern with encryption law is not necessarily that FastMail will respond to warrants (though total non-compliance in a non-5 eyes country would be ideal), its how frequently and do they need to otherwise compromise the security of the product in order to do so. FastMail seems to think that the new laws will impact them negatively.[0] FastMail's response to these claims has not been exactly confidence inspiring as the Australian government could compel the company to comply not just individual coders.[1] The real question I'm asking is, is fastmail my only real alternative to gmail? 0: https://reclaimthenet.org/fastmail-australian-encryption-law/ https://reclaimthenet.org/fastmail-australian-encryption-law... 1: https://fastmail.blog/2018/12/21/advocating-for-privacy-aabill-australia/ https://fastmail.blog/2018/12/21/advocating-for-privacy-aabi...
  - ocdtrekkie 7y ago
    FastMail certainly isn't the only alternative, but it's a really good one. I don't blame FastMail for criticizing the law, and it does impact them negatively: Despite not affecting their service at all from a technical standpoint, it is scaring people away from their service. For the most part, any paid email service which has custom domain support and isn't owned by an adtech company should be, as far as privacy concerns go, likely pretty solid. You just tend to see FastMail brought up a lot because a lot of us have switched to it and are enthusiastic fans of it. ;)
  - newscracker 7y ago
    There are several Ask HN posts about alternatives for Gmail. Apart from Fastmail, there are more privacy focused services. Some of them: posteo.de, runbox.com, mailbox.org and mailfence.com. These are a lot cheaper than Fastmail too, with full IMAP support. If you want a much cheaper service for many mailboxes, take a look at Migadu. For most people who need multiple mailboxes but don't send a lot of emails (but receive many), I'd find it hard to beat that pricing.
BlueTemplar 7y ago
I feel that those are the easiest. ProtonMail. IM : XMPP(Conversations/Pidgin/Jitsi) or Matrix Meanwhile, it's getting rid of YouTube, Google Play Services and Captcha that is proving problematic...
- mxuribe 7y ago
  +1 on the mention of Matrix!
- bbatha 7y ago
  > ProtonMail How's the imap support or using 3rd party email clients? XMPP encryption is super janky, and the ecosystem is dying a slow death. Matrix is looking pretty appealing, but it doesn't work that great as a direct messaging platform. I've found that notifications are often delayed and and the UX is focused on the chat room case. > Google Play Services that's the easiest, don't use android :)
tmitchell 7y ago
Can't help with hangouts but I've been starting to play around with Helm (https://thehelm.com/ https://thehelm.com/). You self-host a little box at your home, it sets up TLS certs via LetsEncrypt and tunnels to an AWS frontend with a clean IP that ferries your data to/from your network. All data is secured on your device. Bring your own domain, supports IMAP/CalDav/CardDav. So far, I'm a fan but I'm still battle testing it before I start moving in earnest.
andyjpb 7y ago
For Hangouts replacements there are quite a few WebRTC video conferencing sites that can work with URL sharing and either with or without accounts. I regularly use https://meet.jit.si https://meet.jit.si https://appear.in/ https://appear.in/ and https://appear.in/ https://appear.in/

by bbatha 7y ago

ocdtrekkie 7y ago

The hubbub about the article there is FUD, particularly when it comes to FastMail. Since FastMail isn't an end-to-end encrypted service (Gmail isn't either), laws about thwarting encryption are entirely irrelevant: Both must respond to a legal government order for your information. Google responds to many tens of thousands of these requests yearly: https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/overview?t=table https://transparencyreport.google.com/user-data/overview?t=t... If you are not Australian, the likelihood of getting your data subpoena'd from an Australian company is pretty low. If you're in the US, it's far more likely for your Gmail data to be successfully subpoena'd. Unless you belong to a fairly narrow set of people, the risk of government access to your data is relatively low. Meanwhile, the threat of advertiser access to your data is high for everyone: Don't trust an ad company with your data, even if they currently say they won't use it for ads.

bbatha 7y ago
I'm not trying to compare gmail and fastmail. I'm trying get off gmail, and that is the top priority. However, changing email providers is relatively disruptive and I'd prefer to choose one that can last me 5-10 years. Fastmail was that choice but uncertainty about Australian encryption laws throws a wrench into that equation. My concern with encryption law is not necessarily that FastMail will respond to warrants (though total non-compliance in a non-5 eyes country would be ideal), its how frequently and do they need to otherwise compromise the security of the product in order to do so. FastMail seems to think that the new laws will impact them negatively.[0] FastMail's response to these claims has not been exactly confidence inspiring as the Australian government could compel the company to comply not just individual coders.[1] The real question I'm asking is, is fastmail my only real alternative to gmail? 0: https://reclaimthenet.org/fastmail-australian-encryption-law/ https://reclaimthenet.org/fastmail-australian-encryption-law... 1: https://fastmail.blog/2018/12/21/advocating-for-privacy-aabill-australia/ https://fastmail.blog/2018/12/21/advocating-for-privacy-aabi...
- ocdtrekkie 7y ago
  FastMail certainly isn't the only alternative, but it's a really good one. I don't blame FastMail for criticizing the law, and it does impact them negatively: Despite not affecting their service at all from a technical standpoint, it is scaring people away from their service. For the most part, any paid email service which has custom domain support and isn't owned by an adtech company should be, as far as privacy concerns go, likely pretty solid. You just tend to see FastMail brought up a lot because a lot of us have switched to it and are enthusiastic fans of it. ;)
- newscracker 7y ago
  There are several Ask HN posts about alternatives for Gmail. Apart from Fastmail, there are more privacy focused services. Some of them: posteo.de, runbox.com, mailbox.org and mailfence.com. These are a lot cheaper than Fastmail too, with full IMAP support. If you want a much cheaper service for many mailboxes, take a look at Migadu. For most people who need multiple mailboxes but don't send a lot of emails (but receive many), I'd find it hard to beat that pricing.

BlueTemplar 7y ago

I feel that those are the easiest. ProtonMail. IM : XMPP(Conversations/Pidgin/Jitsi) or Matrix Meanwhile, it's getting rid of YouTube, Google Play Services and Captcha that is proving problematic...

mxuribe 7y ago
+1 on the mention of Matrix!
bbatha 7y ago
> ProtonMail How's the imap support or using 3rd party email clients? XMPP encryption is super janky, and the ecosystem is dying a slow death. Matrix is looking pretty appealing, but it doesn't work that great as a direct messaging platform. I've found that notifications are often delayed and and the UX is focused on the chat room case. > Google Play Services that's the easiest, don't use android :)

tmitchell 7y ago

Can't help with hangouts but I've been starting to play around with Helm (https://thehelm.com/ https://thehelm.com/). You self-host a little box at your home, it sets up TLS certs via LetsEncrypt and tunnels to an AWS frontend with a clean IP that ferries your data to/from your network. All data is secured on your device. Bring your own domain, supports IMAP/CalDav/CardDav. So far, I'm a fan but I'm still battle testing it before I start moving in earnest.

andyjpb 7y ago

For Hangouts replacements there are quite a few WebRTC video conferencing sites that can work with URL sharing and either with or without accounts. I regularly use https://meet.jit.si https://meet.jit.si https://appear.in/ https://appear.in/ and https://appear.in/ https://appear.in/