3 ms·
What i meant is getting rid of html,css,js,etc and the entire stack and replacing it with something simpler. There isn't an issue with interoperability with oth
by Crinus 7y ago
What i meant is getting rid of html,css,js,etc and the entire stack and replacing it with something simpler. There isn't an issue with interoperability with other browsers as there wont be any other browsers, there is no need to interoperate with other organizations as there wont be any other organizations and any interoperability with operating systems can be addressed by simply using cross platform tech when building the browser.
You may not bother but others will (and really you can say that about anything that tries to come up with something new, that is not a reason to stop trying to come with new stuff).
- pfraze 7y agoYesterday I was making a bunch of joke marketing lines and "Sorry we still use HTML" was one of them. It's really just a matter of constraining the novelty. We're trying to make some specific improvements on the applications & networking stack of the Web. Redoing the entire web platform is out of scope (for now).
- jhoechtl 7y agoSeriously, replace it with stgh. which is unfriendly to advertisment, yet still enables a freemium web experience. Ipfs with filecoin sounds resonable at first sight.