> In legal filings, Google has disputed that conservatives are an identifiable class under the law. In a decision, the judge on the case said the court “indeed

> In legal filings, Google has disputed that conservatives are an identifiable class under the law. In a decision, the judge on the case said the court “indeed has doubts” about the viability of the idea, but it is, for the time being, letting the case move ahead. Isn't this the main argument that is used to defend gerrymandering? That since political ideology is not a protected class, it's okay to redraw district maps that discriminate against a particular ideology?