2 ms·
It is a burden however, and one that isn't necessary if your company has a sane BYOD policy that protects them while not being too invasive. The reality is, co
by diminoten 7y ago
It is a burden however, and one that isn't necessary if your company has a sane BYOD policy that protects them while not being too invasive.
The reality is, convenience wins again here. I, for one, don't give a shit what control my company has over my phone. Not only has nothing ever happened as a result of me using a BYOD policy, the overall rate in the industry seems acceptably low too.
I only have 24 hours in my day, I can't be worrying about things that aren't likely to effect me in any material way. I simply don't have time.
- quicklime 7y agoWhat do you consider an acceptably low rate, and what is the actual rate? I hear stories all the time about companies that are tracking their employees' GPS locations. Many of the stories involve people getting fired.
- diminoten 7y agoLiterally no you don't. What happens more often: car accidents due to speeding or people being fired because their company tracks where they are and doesn't approve? Do you still speed?
- moonfern 7y agoThat policy relates to your whole working career. If you somehow managed to violate the policy you will deal with the people who have the power and/or duty to enforce this policy.
- ginko 7y agoThe burden of having two devices seems lower than the burden of having to separate work from private life on a single device.
- diminoten 7y agoIt's not, by far.