It's too bad these design awards often highlight sites that don't show much of anything and interfaces that don't do much of anything. There's some nice art the

It's too bad these design awards often highlight sites that don't show much of anything and interfaces that don't do much of anything. There's some nice art there (most of it self-promotional) but there just aren't many design challenges to solve on many of those sites. This is my favorite design of 2010 (though it's been around in lesser forms for a while): http://www.cbssports.com/nba/gametracker/live/NBA_20101216_ATL@BOS http://www.cbssports.com/nba/gametracker/live/NBA_20101216_A... That interface takes all the information about an ongoing basketball game and organizes it visually while making it look appealing. It's also very much _web_ design, with dozens of useful links woven in all over the place. I guess you could say that's technically information architecture or UX or something, but to me it's the core of really valuable design.