5 ms·
Can someone explain how the cartoon is antisemetic? Calling it such doesn't make it so. If I blend Putin into a Cassowary crossed with a Peacock would it not be
by nerpderp82 7y ago
Can someone explain how the cartoon is antisemetic? Calling it such doesn't make it so. If I blend Putin into a Cassowary crossed with a Peacock would it not be apropos? Cartoons are supposed to be edgy and uncomfortable.
It looks like like the NYT succumbed to the mob whipped up by the Trump administration, it meerly doesn't want the criticism.
- Chlatstibur 7y agoI would recommend this article [1] that explains the background of why the cartoon is problematic. For an analogy: Drawing Trump as a banana eating ape would not raise eyes, while drawing Obama like this undoubtedly would. [1] https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/285781/soviet-anti-semitic-cartoons https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/285781/sov...
- Rebelgecko 7y agoShowing a non-Jewish world leader in a yarmulke put it a bit over the top for me. I think the star of David was fair game because it's a symbol of Israel as a country, but depicting Trump as some sort of crypto-Jew felt like imagery you'd see in Nazi propaganda or an illustrated version of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
- ikeyany 7y agoThe idea is that Trump is working for Israel. What in the world is a crypto-Jew? Does it use a blockchain?
- dbcurtis 7y ago> What in the world is a crypto-Jew? LMGTFY: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto-Judaism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto-Judaism Staying out of sight to stay alive, basically.
- ikeyany 7y agoOh...I don't think anyone relevant seriously thinks he's a crypto-Jew. People just think he's spineless and is easily manipulatable by Putin/Kim/Netanyahu.
- prepend 7y agoDo you think it is strange how he is so easily manipulated but yet Shumer and Pelosi and his own staff and many others fail to manipulate him? This seems like such an odd, easily disproved statement that I am surprised when so many repeat it. I’m not a fan, but it seems more like his regular failure than some manipulation trait.
- OJFord 7y ago'Crypto' as a prefix means that <thing being prefixed> is done in secret. Wikipedia lists some common ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/Crypto https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/Crypto It's like neo- (new) or proto- (earliest form of).
- Rebelgecko 7y agoCrypto Jews are people that profess to follow other religions while secretly being Jewish. Clearly there's a range of personal beliefs on this topic, but in my eyes a cartoon saying that Israel has undue influence on the US is A-OK. Even if you don't agree with the cartoon's premise, there's a reasonable debate that can be had. A cartoon saying that the Jews have an undue influence on the US is where things get yucky. The inclusion of apolitical religious symbols instead of national or even Zionist ones is what leads me to think that the cartoon is referring to the latter scenario. I don't think doing things like including the Star of David or using a dog as a caricature are inherently anti-Semetic, it just displays a lack of awareness or sensitivity to how those images have been used in the past. But using them in conjunction with the yarmulke leads me to think the cartoon is trying to say that Trump has somehow been infected by the virality of Jewishness, not just by Israeli interests as some of the defenders of the cartoon are saying.
- icebraining 7y agoTrump did wear one, when he became the first US president to visit the Western Wall: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-becomes-the-first-sitting-us-president-to-visit-the-western-wall https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-becomes-the-first-s...
- Rebelgecko 7y agoObama and Clinton both wore yarmulkes when they visited the Western Wall— Obama actually complained about how he felt that Arab media used pictures of him in a yarmulke for propaganda purposes. I personally doubt that the reason that the cartoonist put a yarmulke on Trump is because he wore a yarmulke one time back in 2017.
- icebraining 7y agoNeither Obama nor Clinton wore it as presidents. The cartoonist finds that a relevant fact.
- Rebelgecko 7y agoWhy does it matter that Obama wore one while he was campaigning and Trump waited until he was actually elected?
- njharman 7y agoAnything that does not praise Israel is antisemetic. More accurately such will be labeled as antisemetic by various special interest groups to further their own agendas and occasionally get picked up and amplified by the rage mob.
- prepend 7y agoI don’t think it is directly anti-Semitic, but is similar to other things that are. So it makes me uneasy that perhaps the author was trying to cloak anti-semitism. I felt similar when political cartoons were made picturing Obama as a monkey even if the surface was non-racist. I thought I remembered a “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” cartoon but could not find it. Even though the cartoon wasn’t technically racist, I didn’t like it because it could easily be cover for genuine racial bigotry.