3 ms·
That's certainly not true for the NYT. The NYT's stock has done very well in recent years and it's solely because their digital subscription business has taken
by Despegar 7y ago
That's certainly not true for the NYT. The NYT's stock has done very well in recent years and it's solely because their digital subscription business has taken off. It's one of the few publications that doesn't really depend on Facebook and Google for revenue.
- malvosenior 7y agoThey do threaten it though. They could elevate competitors voices or choose to filter the NYT from results of weigh them lower. I'm sure social media and search both drive a huge amount of NYT traffic. The only time I ever read it is when it's linked here.
- Despegar 7y agoFacebook already made that change a long time ago to emphasize sharing of photos, status updates, etc over news. NYT, WaPo, WSJ have all done fine while other publications that were founded on the premise of social traffic have gone out of business. They're destination sites and brands in and of themselves, they don't rely on third party referral traffic.
- malvosenior 7y agoThis is incorrect. I assure you they get a large porition of their traffic from referrals and Google search results (and Google News). They were literally just complaining about this yesterday: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/09/business/media/google-news-industry-antitrust.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/09/business/media/google-new...