4 ms·
I don’t think the translation is the amazing part – as one of the creators said here, at the moment it mostly does word-for-word translation. Google’s statistic
by ugh 16y ago
I don’t think the translation is the amazing part – as one of the creators said here, at the moment it mostly does word-for-word translation. Google’s statistical machine translation is mightily impressive technology, I’m not sure whether you could even theoretically put it on a phone at the moment.
You would ideally want the OCR and text replacement together with Google’s translation algorithms, which, besides requiring a network connection at the moment, would also introduce way too much lag that would kill the experience.
(Word-for-word translation is a perfect compromise in the meantime.)
- dagw 16y agoRequiring a network connection would also make it useless while travelling abroad, which would probably make up about 90% of the times when you'd actually need this app. Not using a network connection is vital for this app to be of any real use.
- CamperBob 16y agoSo do both. You're on the net, you get better results. You're not on the net, you can still get by.