3 ms·
Presumably the objection is that it's not the original title. It's also an odd wording, I think "is interesting to read" might be clearer.
by wyldfire 7y ago
Presumably the objection is that it's not the original title. It's also an odd wording, I think "is interesting to read" might be clearer.
- CalChris 7y agoClick baity. It's kind of like but not quite at the level of You won't believe what the RISC-V bit manipulation extension does! Why not just cite the document's name? Bore me. Please. In fairness to the doc, it's a rationale. It should educate.