3 ms·
Prevention to 100% would be costly. They have diminishing marginal returns. Why would someone pay $50,000/year for a hypothetical system which would theoretica
by froindt 7y ago
Prevention to 100% would be costly. They have diminishing marginal returns.
Why would someone pay $50,000/year for a hypothetical system which would theoretically catch everyone and fill out the police report automatically when the store experiences a tiny $300 annual shrinkage loss?