3 ms·
Thanks swannodette, very kind of you! Yes, it's been cool to layer Clojure on top of legacy Java and see what happens. Some want to sell Clojure as "a better Ja
by dirtyvagabond 16y ago
Thanks swannodette, very kind of you! Yes, it's been cool to layer Clojure on top of legacy Java and see what happens. Some want to sell Clojure as "a better Java than Java"... I think that may be a little misguided. But, there are certain situations where it rings true... at least IMHO
- swannodette 16y agoI don't think Clojure's goal is to be "better Java". Rather, that for whatever task you might consider Java, writing that task in Clojure should be: * easier to write * perform just as well * be concurrency safe Clojure isn't there yet, but it's well on its way I think.
- jshen 16y agoit's easier to have unsafe concurrency in clojure. It's certainly easier to get it right by default than in java, but it's still very easy to introduce a race condition or some such.
- jshen 16y agoTypo, I meant easy not easier
- nickik 16y agotrue but you can use it to script java witch would be better then doing it in java.
- Luyt 16y agoClojure isn't really 'layered on Java'; it does however run in the JVM (just like Java).