3 ms·
In my experience SCons has the right design, but the implementation is incredibly slow. Buck and Bazel are superior options.
by dfgdghdf 7y ago
In my experience SCons has the right design, but the implementation is incredibly slow. Buck and Bazel are superior options.
- microcolonel 7y agoThis is why CMake is spectacular (for all of its many, many, many warts): it spits out good, fast configurations for a large number of build runners; and they all tend to work. CMake + Ninja is spectacular if you want to spend less time compiling, but maybe not ideal if you are not familiar with CMake idiosyncrasies and want to configure it for something. I usually find that I can add a pkgconfig-based dependency to a CMake project without much fuss, but anything much more complicated than that I typically do not enjoy.