> the second is not a good source. That's the genetic fallacy. They link to a number of other sources from that article with supporting information such as a C

> the second is not a good source. That's the genetic fallacy. They link to a number of other sources from that article with supporting information such as a Connecticut College study and a Princeton University study. I would deem university sources "good" (although you're still subject to cherry-picking and the like)