5 ms·
Unfortunately someone would raise a privacy stink just like they did for the netflix prize data and the aol search data. This is why we can't have nice things.
by tocomment 16y ago
Unfortunately someone would raise a privacy stink just like they did for the netflix prize data and the aol search data. This is why we can't have nice things.
- petercooper 16y agoBut Delicious's database is already public (if you take out private fields on the user table and the private links). Even just the links + tags without any user info would rock for semantic Web usage.
- ryanwaggoner 16y agoIt's public data! You could scrape and index it now for free if you wanted...
- bootload 16y ago"... It's public data! You could scrape and index it now for free ..." That is the most insightful thing I've read today.
- petercooper 16y agoThough I've noticed only pages up to 200 work when going back through history.. this only gets you a few days back on the most popular tags.
- mikeklaas 16y agoSure, but user pages go back farther than that...
- scorpion032 16y agoThey even throttle the friendfeed scraper which graciously pulls all its users data at once. You can't write a simple scraper that is not distributed in 100 of machines across the web to pull out their data.
- viraptor 16y agoI heard that there is this thing called "the cloud" where you can rent services based on the work time. That makes cheapo servers both realistic and quite simple ;) Actually I just noticed you get 750h of free micro instance time from aws... I wonder if it would be worth doing. I imagine the link+tags are <100GB in total.