>...judiciary must acquiesce to the official class (which is synonymous with the party), whose opinion is the only one that matters. Since we've gone down this

>...judiciary must acquiesce to the official class (which is synonymous with the party), whose opinion is the only one that matters. Since we've gone down this rabbit-hole, doesn't that mean or infer that the states is no longer a "rule of law" country, since the current idyllic seems to be overturning laws - based purely on political alignment (e.g.: the "sudden rash" of states banning abortion because the end-goal is to overturn Roe v. Wade)?