4 ms·

I think breathalyzers would be great, but I believe the reliability isn't at all there. Seatbelts are only a protective devices once you are already in a crash

I think breathalyzers would be great, but I believe the reliability isn't at all there. Seatbelts are only a protective devices once you are already in a crash, not their root cause. Modern cars will also already incessantly beep to you, and people stupid enough to buy a defeat device for them might as well fly out the windshield for all I care, their behavior isn't likely to cause much harm for others. But I'm not at all opposed. I'm happy to do away with speed cams if we can simply have modern cars enforce the speed limits they already know about.

4ntonius8lock 7y ago
I'm much more in favor of infringing on privacy in a way to prevent law breaking than enforcement. My point is: the current system of enforcement is pretty authoritarian. And many of us take issue with that. Especially since the stated motives of such authoritarians don't hold too much water when looked at thoroughly (as I'm trying to point out with this example of enforcement vs prevention)