It's similar to facial recognition. It's not about the ability to look at something, face image or DNA. It's about ability to remember that information and use

It's similar to facial recognition. It's not about the ability to look at something, face image or DNA. It's about ability to remember that information and use it. Some argue that they want ownership of information that concern themselves, and right to deny others from handling that without explicit consent. Others argue that collection is alright but sharing (with or without exceptions) isn't. Others disagree completely and say that information belongs to whoever holds it, as it's immoral to deprive person of rights to have memories. It's also arguable that privacy laws may apply differently between persons and companies. Or between natural and artificial memory banks. Or that different rules should apply based on volume of data stored, like number of persons involved. I've read many different opinions on this matter. Lean towards some, but haven't firmly decided on any. I don't think this will be fully resolved until someone would invent eidetic memory drugs or implants or something like that, and we'll have to erase the current boundary between humans and machines.