Wow, the generator is amazing. Two out of three articles were beyond what I perceived was possible, beyond maybe GP2. Is there a browser extension that detects

Wow, the generator is amazing. Two out of three articles were beyond what I perceived was possible, beyond maybe GP2. Is there a browser extension that detects and warns about possible fake news this can be built into? 1. seed: nytimes.com seed: AI will certainly be good seed: June 6, 2019 - Paul Krugman generated: ∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨ Artificial intelligence – by definition, computer code – can provide more than a speed boost. Many researchers now believe that intelligence, better defined as capacity to learn, will be increasingly provided by machines. Autonomy, already on the march, has become even more central. Future programs will likely be as familiar as Adam Smith’s invisible hand. If true, such predictions open up fundamentally new possibilities for future development. We will be able to quickly develop services based on or even built around lots of self-learning software. We’ll be able to use AI-based services without physically owning the software. As sensors in buildings, cars, buildings and cities start recording our activities, we will be able to experience “smart cities” and “smart cities” the moment they materialize. This future, however, is not yet in the cards. The gains are probably years or even decades away. Even in the areas where AI might dominate, such as physical warehousing, improving automation has lagged behind improvements in other areas of business. And our thinking, though improving, is still far from sophisticated enough to take full advantage of AI. Also: Please take a moment to watch the full program of this interview. Every panelist will speak out in favor of AI. 2. seed: nytimes.com seed: Uncertainty around AI is overhyped seed: June 6, 2019 - Paul Krugman generated: ∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨ There’s no denying that AI, in many ways, is in its infancy. It isn’t something that belongs on a refrigerator or wall clock; it’s a whole new area of research and development. While it may be commonplace within a few years, AI will likely be a long way off; if it even becomes an important factor in the economy as a whole, well, probably about a century from now. It’s also true that many worry about the potential for superintelligent machines, who could threaten all sorts of things from human liberty to national security. But that’s not the right question to ask. There is no “right” or “wrong” answer here — nobody really knows how AI will evolve. And there’s no “theory” (although there are several, ranging from quantum theory to AI techniques employed by biologists, and from genetics to postulates to mathematical models) that will explain it. Neither are there explanations for the values, levels or usefulness of AI models. So, what we’re left with is sheer hard scientific uncertainty. But let’s say we do know a little. The odds of a superintelligent agent that can become sentient, one that would harm other humans or destroy our civilization, seem minuscule. If you think that chance is small, and that AI is likely to be less likely to cross that threshold than is real intelligence, then the effects on your consciousness and your mental space and our experience of it may seem inconsequential. And that’s no reason to spout half-baked fear mongering. 3. seed: nytimes.com seed: AI Uncertainty is Exaggerated seed: June 6, 2019 - Paul Krugman generated: ∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨∨ As noted, Donald Trump uses the expression “AI Doom” – in part because he understands AI but mostly because he responds to the media’s reports on AI, which Trump himself frequently repeats, frequently without evidence. AI may have risks – as in the threats from robots and remotely piloted aircraft – but most analysts who follow AI say it has such promise that its damage to people’s security and quality of life is likely to be contained. Indeed, the main ethical question with AI is what to do when machines decide that killing their human masters is a good idea. It’s easy to exaggerate AI’s immediate threat. The machine that driverless cars are supposed to replace is still pretty active. And if, as predicted, the development of AI renders it easier for people to work, then it’s also likely to give them more jobs. The main threat with AI is what it could do to workers, although the more automation, the more all sorts of jobs become easily replaceable. But a small dose of AI is actually a very good thing.