3 ms·
I’m a little confused by the title. Wasn’t nav introduced in HTML5? Anyway, agree with what’s being said here. K.I.S.S.
by devin 7y ago
I’m a little confused by the title. Wasn’t nav introduced in HTML5?
Anyway, agree with what’s being said here. K.I.S.S.
- tambourine_man 7y agoYes it was. It also bothered me while reading. I think he’s advocating for semantic HTML, not 90s HTML
- isostatic 7y agoIt was. So was styling form elements. The idea isn't to pretend it's 1999 and only use stuff that works in netscape4/IE5, but to build pages in the same way as then. <nav> adds something useful - it helps screen readers out, but costs nothing.
- rzzzt 7y agoThe XHTML default namespace URL is http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml in W3C's HTML5 documents (the link resolves to a page that lists references).
- Tomte 7y agoThere's no reason to "resolve" it. It's just a name, not a gettable resource.