4 ms·
I thought the law stated that what was plainly visible (in plain sight) was implicitly and universally considered evidence. If that is true (not sure that it i
by jjtheblunt 7y ago
I thought the law stated that what was plainly visible (in plain sight) was implicitly and universally considered evidence. If that is true (not sure that it is) wouldn't that mean it's perfectly legal to do whatever you want with pictures?
- jmpman 7y agoJust because a policing technique is considered “legal”, doesn’t mean that a community needs to allow their police to use that technique.