Yes, of course it is trivially optimized out, that's still not the issue. The question is why that function (and several others) exist in the first place! Is th

Yes, of course it is trivially optimized out, that's still not the issue. The question is why that function (and several others) exist in the first place! Is there a bug (which is then copypasted several times) and the code is actually supposed to flip between enabled and disabled (in which case it should really be written foo = !foo)? Or something else?