3 ms·
The bit-by-bit migration of control panel to settings is iterative if not anything else. Else you'd need to wait years for them to migrate all things. Still, I
by sebazzz 7y ago
The bit-by-bit migration of control panel to settings is iterative if not anything else. Else you'd need to wait years for them to migrate all things.
Still, I don't believe everything is eligible for migration. Take the network adapter TCP/IP settings, I don't a migration happening for that. I don't think UWP is suitable for such information density. And in my opinion the UWP panel is less discoverable.
- maxxxxx 7y ago" I don't think UWP is suitable for such information density. " This may be true but it doesn't speak well for UWP.
- contextfree 7y agoThe most recent release of WinUI/UWP makes it easier to create high-density UI with a new Compact sizing option for the stock controls: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/style/spacing https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/style/sp...
- hiram112 7y agoIsn't UWP dead now, or am I confusing that with another alphabetized Windows dev framework that was recently shelved?
- contextfree 7y agoEveryone seems to have their own definitions of what is or isn't "dead" or what is or isn't UWP, but as far as Windows native development is concerned, they are still producing new versions of WinUI with new features and new versions of Windows are still adding new WinRT APIs. https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/blob/master/docs/roadmap.md https://github.com/microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml/blob/master/d...