3 ms·

> It wasn't possible to just add "fields" to a card. > Everything had to be setup specifically for the precise problem I've studied and written about tabulator

by kens 7y ago

> It wasn't possible to just add "fields" to a card. > Everything had to be setup specifically for the precise problem I've studied and written about tabulators a lot, and this is overstating the difficulty of using a tabulator. Adding a new field is trivial, just type the data into that field on a card. (Unless you want nice custom-printed cards.) And configuring a tabulator is a lot easier than writing a program. You plugged wires into a plugboard connecting fields on the card to columns on the printer, or to counters to compute totals. To sort cards on a field, you set the sorter to sort on that column and ran the cards through. Tabulators could do some extremely complex things (such as differential equations), but normal tasks were pretty straightforward. If you want to learn more about tabulators, there are lots of manuals on Bitsavers. This one is a good place to start: http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/punchedCard/Training/22-6275-0_Functional_Wiring_Principles.pdf http://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/punchedCard/Training/22-6275-0_... (Obviously I'm not supporting IBM's actions; I just want people to understand better how tabulators work.)

GnarfGnarf 7y ago
As someone who has programmed tabulators, I can confirm this is correct. Once IBM delivered the machine, customer personnel were able to wire the panel to perform calculations and print reports.
mthoms 7y ago
Thanks for your input. I'm not familiar with these machines so I look forward to reading that link. The researcher does say: >IBM engineers had to create Hollerith codes to differentiate between a Jew who had been worked to death and one who had been gassed, then print the cards, configure the machines, train the staff, and continuously maintain the fragile systems every two weeks on site in the concentration camps Source https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ibm-holocaust_b_1301691 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ibm-holocaust_b_1301691 Though it's not clear in this passage whether he is referring to IBM itself or its German subsidiary.
- snotrockets 7y ago
  The discussed book provides evidence that the German subsidiary was micromanaged by Watson.

by kens 7y ago

GnarfGnarf 7y ago

As someone who has programmed tabulators, I can confirm this is correct. Once IBM delivered the machine, customer personnel were able to wire the panel to perform calculations and print reports.

mthoms 7y ago

Thanks for your input. I'm not familiar with these machines so I look forward to reading that link. The researcher does say: >IBM engineers had to create Hollerith codes to differentiate between a Jew who had been worked to death and one who had been gassed, then print the cards, configure the machines, train the staff, and continuously maintain the fragile systems every two weeks on site in the concentration camps Source https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ibm-holocaust_b_1301691 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ibm-holocaust_b_1301691 Though it's not clear in this passage whether he is referring to IBM itself or its German subsidiary.

snotrockets 7y ago
The discussed book provides evidence that the German subsidiary was micromanaged by Watson.