Thanks for that! > it was excellent at running Compute Shaders On one hand, that statement supports my belief that there is more to graphics than just a lot o

Thanks for that! > it was excellent at running Compute Shaders On one hand, that statement supports my belief that there is more to graphics than just a lot of raw compute flops. > It would have been a very strong chip in the high-end visualization world, where tiny triangles, super-short lines and massive data sets are the main workloads - all things Larrabee was great at. But this goes the opposite way. :-) Because you'd think that a lot of small primitives would make it harder to deploy those raw compute flops.