3 ms·
that's not the 'fishy af' part. what's a bit fishy is the comedy of errors afterwards. only slightly though. it's entirely plausible. had he also tried unsucces
by jiveturkey 7y ago
that's not the 'fishy af' part. what's a bit fishy is the comedy of errors afterwards. only slightly though. it's entirely plausible. had he also tried unsuccessfully to urinate on the fire, then maybe i'd be doubtful.
- nullc 7y agoIn all of the zillion times that the same stuff happened without the accompanying errors you never heard about it. If you look at major aviation or industrial disasters a great many of of them involve two or more unlikely to fail components failing at once. It's not reasonable to look at it after the fact and say "look, a coverup! those two systems wouldn't likely have failed at once!"
- Gibbon1 7y agoI have a few experiences with fires. What happens is panic causes people to repeatedly under escalate.