"The main reason is that at this point, BitBucket is simple attempting to feature copy from Github except using Mercurial in the background." I am so tired to

"The main reason is that at this point, BitBucket is simple attempting to feature copy from Github except using Mercurial in the background." I am so tired to read things like that. Issue-tracking at github is far behind bitbucket issue tracking (try to make complex search queries... you cannot link a commit to an issue except when closing the issue... tags are nice, but i dislike having to create a tag for each milestone/release). Wikis at Github have only been recently backed by a git repository: as far as I know, wikis at bitbucket have always been backed by a mercurial repository. It's true that bitbucket is a lot like github and that github has a bigger and more dynamic community (from my experience, github's infrastructure is also faster), but can we leave bitbucket alone and stop the bashing?