4 ms·
While it doesn't look like anyone else interviewed Alexei Muradov, number of reputable western publications (not blogspam) seem to have taken this source seriou
by pp19dd 7y ago
While it doesn't look like anyone else interviewed Alexei Muradov, number of reputable western publications (not blogspam) seem to have taken this source seriously and are citing it. Washington Post did verify by way of Hollywood Reporter that it seems to be happening.
"The series was commissioned by NTV, a top free-to-air network, owned by Gazprom Media, the media arm of the natural gas giant Gazprom. It was partially financed by the culture ministry, which provided 30 million rubles ($460,000). The total budget has not been made public."
That number is not something the Moscow Times reported on, so it looks like corroboration: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/russia-making-own-tv-series-chernobyl-nuclear-disaster-1216383 https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/russia-making-own-tv-...
Additionally, this claim makes it seem they hurried to catch up - "Principal photography was done last year in neighboring Belarus and the series is currently in postproduction."
- e40 7y agonumber of reputable western publications (not blogspam) seem to have taken this source seriously and are citing it These days, I don't think that's enough of a guarantee.
- topspin 7y agoIndeed. We can't tell if this is genuine because while it is sadly plausible it might also be a troll, and we don't have a media competent enough to detect the difference or credible enough to believe either way. Thankfully it doesn't matter; if there really is going to be a Russian version of Chernobyl it will be awful and everyone except the inveterate whataboutists will point and laugh. That is a metaphysical certitude.