4 ms·
You’re right, I was thinking of a time-independent Hamiltonian. I may be mistaken but I thought that there are no stationary states otherwise (so it wouldn’t ma
by kgwgk 7y ago
You’re right, I was thinking of a time-independent Hamiltonian. I may be mistaken but I thought that there are no stationary states otherwise (so it wouldn’t make sense either to say that the state is a superposition of the states 0 and 1).