5 ms·

Photoshopping is done by hand and generally has mistakes. Good photoshops are still believed. Videos are being altered by machines. They’re being optimized for

by fiblye 7y ago

Photoshopping is done by hand and generally has mistakes. Good photoshops are still believed. Videos are being altered by machines. They’re being optimized for natural looking results. It’s harder to notice small mistakes when frames are going by at 24FPS vs poring over a static image for 30 seconds until you finally notice the one region with mismatched shadows or odd clipping.

naniwaduni 7y ago
On the bright side, video gives a lot more opportunities to make small mistakes for conspiracy theorists, er, fact-checkers to find!
- HeWhoLurksLate 7y ago
  "One person's freedom fighter is another's terrorist."
tuesdayrain 7y ago
I've literally never been able to identify a photoshopped image (except for immediately obvious work), without someone first pointing it out. I have a feeling that the percentage of the population that can spot edited images is in the single digits.
- jgtrosh 7y ago
  As someone who usually spots the Photoshop, I have some trouble assessing the danger of such techniques; thanks for bringing your input. I feel that someone who sees “through” a doctored piece of information will not even realize the power it may have had to others who might not participate in the conversation but end up part of the bubble nonetheless. By the time a fake has been debunked it's too late—but what's the alternative, censorship?
  - edraferi 7y ago
    Not censorship, context. Censorship is disrespectful of the reader; it assumes the authority knows better. Context is respectful; it assumes you will make the best decision (for you) when you have all the relevant information. So don’t delete the fake video. Put a big red exclamation mark next to it that says “this video has been substantially manipulated. Contents may not be genuine.” Also: while viewers and producers both deserve the same respect, producers can forfeit theirs by consistently failing to respect their viewers. A consistent pattern of intentional deception should earn a shadow ban.
kzzzznot 7y ago
Yes but you can pore over each frame if you’re taking time to study as you are suggesting someone is for the photo in this situation

by fiblye 7y ago

naniwaduni 7y ago

On the bright side, video gives a lot more opportunities to make small mistakes for conspiracy theorists, er, fact-checkers to find!

HeWhoLurksLate 7y ago
"One person's freedom fighter is another's terrorist."

tuesdayrain 7y ago

I've literally never been able to identify a photoshopped image (except for immediately obvious work), without someone first pointing it out. I have a feeling that the percentage of the population that can spot edited images is in the single digits.

jgtrosh 7y ago
As someone who usually spots the Photoshop, I have some trouble assessing the danger of such techniques; thanks for bringing your input. I feel that someone who sees “through” a doctored piece of information will not even realize the power it may have had to others who might not participate in the conversation but end up part of the bubble nonetheless. By the time a fake has been debunked it's too late—but what's the alternative, censorship?
- edraferi 7y ago
  Not censorship, context. Censorship is disrespectful of the reader; it assumes the authority knows better. Context is respectful; it assumes you will make the best decision (for you) when you have all the relevant information. So don’t delete the fake video. Put a big red exclamation mark next to it that says “this video has been substantially manipulated. Contents may not be genuine.” Also: while viewers and producers both deserve the same respect, producers can forfeit theirs by consistently failing to respect their viewers. A consistent pattern of intentional deception should earn a shadow ban.

kzzzznot 7y ago

Yes but you can pore over each frame if you’re taking time to study as you are suggesting someone is for the photo in this situation