The ISPO has ruled against the Daily Mail / Mail Online multiple times: https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=07188-18 https://ww

The ISPO has ruled against the Daily Mail / Mail Online multiple times: https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=07188-18 https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - "The publication had failed to handle publication sensitively" https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=05768-18 https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - "Publishing photographs of the complainants taken in such circumstances represented an intrusion; the publication had not sought to justify the publication of the images in the public interest." https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=07543-18 https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - accuracy ("This gave rise to a misleading impression of the effects of GDPR legislation") https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=06837-18 https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - accuracy ("This article was a report of an inquest, in which the deceased had been inaccurately identified. This was a fundamental and damaging error on a basic point of fact. [...T]he correct position was readily available, [so] there had been a failure on the part of the agency providing the story to take care over its accuracy.") https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/ruling/?id=20912-17 https://www.ipso.co.uk/rulings-and-resolution-statements/rul... - accuracy ("The repetition of these serious allegations against the man, with no indication they had been disproven, seriously misrepresented the judgment") amongst others.