The publisher/platform thing is also a false dilemma that keeps getting repeated even though it has no basis in the reality of the law. U.S.C 230 explicitly sta

The publisher/platform thing is also a false dilemma that keeps getting repeated even though it has no basis in the reality of the law. U.S.C 230 explicitly states: > No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. The same law also states: > any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected So this idea that these platforms are de-facto publishers because they decided to curate their platform is explicitly incorrect as stated by the law.