4 ms·
Is the monitor actually in the same category as existing "reference" monitors that cost 5 figures? If the answer to that is yes, then the fundamental mistake i
by frou_dh 7y ago
Is the monitor actually in the same category as existing "reference" monitors that cost 5 figures?
If the answer to that is yes, then the fundamental mistake is presenting the monitor at a show watched by consumers. Because that's just a recipe for bafflement and mismatched expectations.
- guidedlight 7y agoWell the actual presentation justified the cost saying it was far cheaper than other reference monitors. Unfortunately for Apple that didn’t make a good heading.
- bruceb 7y agoDoes 99% of the population know what a reference monitor is and that they can be $30K. No. If you asked most people today what they remember about the presentation, its the $999 stand.
- gridlockd 7y ago> Is the monitor actually in the same category as existing "reference" monitors that cost 5 figures? Does the back of that Apple thing look anything like this? https://assets.fatllama.com/images/large/sony-oled-17-trimaster-monitor-76348033.jpg https://assets.fatllama.com/images/large/sony-oled-17-trimas... No? Then it's not in the same category.