5 ms·
I am saying the former. Yeah, I guess you're right that camera-to-object distance wouldn't matter. And you're right that two eyes would be a problem. Even if t
by jackowayed 16y ago
I am saying the former. Yeah, I guess you're right that camera-to-object distance wouldn't matter.
And you're right that two eyes would be a problem. Even if they have the same prescription, I think the fact that the angle from the left eye to the screen and from the right eye to the screen would be different.
It seems like a monocole should be doable, at least if I dictate that they center the phone in front of their eye and the distance from their eye to the screen. But I don't know much about optics either.
- stoney 16y agoI'm not sure that the refraction of a lens is mathematically invertible/reversible? As I understand it, the problem with my eye is that my lens doesn't focus a point light source (e.g. a pixel) onto a point on my retina - one consequence of which is that the point source gets smeared out over a larger area (also I have astigmatism which means my eyes aren't perfectly spherical so colours get messed up, but lets ignore that!). You can't fix that smearing by warping the shape of the image, but maybe you could adjust the brightness of the adjacent pixels to cancel out the smeared out bit - I guess by making the adjacent pixels a little darker than they should be. I don't know if that's a solvable set of equations. If I flip my glasses over and look through the lens backwards, my vision doesn't get twice as bad - it's actually better than no glasses at all. Not sure what that tells you other than optics is very confusing to me.