3 ms·
Content from https://arc.io/pricing https://arc.io/pricing : CDN Bandwidth $0.02 per GB Egress (worldwide) (76% cheaper than AWS1) Us
by thinkmassive 7y ago
Content from https://arc.io/pricing https://arc.io/pricing :
CDN Bandwidth $0.02 per GB
Egress (worldwide) (76% cheaper than AWS1)
Usage is billed monthly, on the first day of each calendar month.
Additionally, only peer-to-peer egress bandwidth is billed; all peer-to-peer ingress bandwidth is free. For example, if a 100kB image is loaded from Arc's peer-to-peer network, only 100kB of bandwidth is billed, not 200kB (100kB of egress + 100kB of ingress).
- namibj 7y agoStill 2x compared to backblaze b2. E.g., it better have good performance.
- ipsum2 7y agobackblaze b2 is not a CDN.
- tiernano 7y agoNot directly, no, but stick Cloudflare in front and now you have a cdn that the storage is cheap and depending on tier you pick, cdn is free. Even the bandwidth from b2 to Cloudflare is free.
- dkh 7y agoNo, but it's still likely to outperform a system delivering assets over WebRTC from whatever p2p users are serving it up.
- namibj 7y agoBut if they don't manage to outperform it (distributed tends to be slow), it won't really matter if it's officially a CDN or not. Amazon S3 is also not a CDN, yet many use it that way. As long as it delivers better performance, it might be worth it.
- pfisch 7y agoSo this is unreliable, potentially slow, and more expensive than bunnyCDN? That makes no sense and this whole idea sounds like a pitch I would see for an ICO.