5 ms·
It's not.
by megous 7y ago
It's not.
- StavrosK 7y agoSee the sibling comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20109564 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20109564
- megous 7y agoRFCs don't define any meaning to '+' as described in this thread, except that local part of the address should be interpreted locally (usually by MDA), and preserved unmodified during message transfer. There's no + aliasing in the specs. There's no interpretation defined for local part of email address.
- StavrosK 7y agoOh, yes. I meant "+" is an acceptable character to use in the local part of an email address, as per the RFC. I see now where the misunderstanding lies.