3 ms·

Those authors are not credible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Seneff

• reizorc 7y ago
  And Wikipedia is?
  • lordlimecat 7y ago
    Wikipedia cites its sources, and some of them are juicy indeed.... >In 2011, Seneff began publishing articles on topics related to biology and medicine, an area in which she has no relevant qualifications or expertise, in low-impact, open access journals, >Seneff's claim that glyphosate is a major cause of autism and that, "At today's rates, by 2025, half the kids born will be diagnosed with autism," has also been criticized...contrary to Seneff's claims, many scientific reviews have found that the rise in autism rates over the past 20 years is due to changes in diagnostic practices >Clinical neurologist and skeptic Steven Novella criticized Seneff's Entropy publication for making "correlation is causation" assumptions using broad statistical extrapolations from limited data, >In 2014–2016 Seneff was proposed as an expert witness for litigators seeking damages from Pfizer associated with their cholesterol drug Lipitor,[15] but the court dismissed the claim largely because Seneff lacked expert status I love the last one; she's actually a court-certified quack.
• asdff 7y ago
  It's also a predatory journal. https://predatoryjournals.com/journals/ https://predatoryjournals.com/journals/