3 ms·
Getting banned from YouTube is not a violation of individual rights. Forcing a company to host videos for free sounds like a violation of individual rights thou
by root_axis 7y ago
Getting banned from YouTube is not a violation of individual rights. Forcing a company to host videos for free sounds like a violation of individual rights though.
- nv-vn 7y agoNo it's totally not a violation of anyone's rights, but that doesn't stop me from being able to oppose the idea. Like how I support drugs being legalized but I don't think everyone should start doing drugs.
- root_axis 7y ago> No it's totally not a violation of anyone's rights, but that doesn't stop me from being able to oppose the idea. Well, I think everyone in this thread can at least agree that nothing should stop anyone from being able to oppose the idea.
- lugg 7y agoMarginalizing a group of individuals for nothing but their culture is a violation of individual rights if you ask me.
- falcolas 7y agoThey aren't hosting the videos for free - they're displaying them alongside advertisements to make revenue off those videos. Also, the rights given an individual are distinct from the rights given to a company, and IMO are distinct from the rights a company deserves (i.e. a company has no inherent right to exist).
- root_axis 7y agoBy "free" I mean "at no cost to the user". If I wanted to host my videos on AWS or bare metal I'd have to pay for the privilege.