3 ms·
I think that being flexible is much more important than having specifically remote employees. I personally would love if I could work even 2 days a week from ho
by nostalgk 7y ago
I think that being flexible is much more important than having specifically remote employees. I personally would love if I could work even 2 days a week from home, giving me a lot more flexibility to clear up life admin (when's the last time anyone had time to go to the bank when it's open? not taking PTO for that...).
- sureaboutthis 7y agoIn a professional environment, I've always been able to take off for such things whenever I wanted without such things. "Hey, boss, I have to run to the bank. Be right back," was all that was required. I really didn't even have to tell the boss. Often a co-worker or a secretary would do.
- koboll 7y agoAgreed. Sometimes I have heads-down days, where I really just want to immerse myself, and being around coworkers is distracting. And sometimes I have less structured days when informal conversations are more necessary. These are roughly analogous to stages of a sprint or project, so they're roughly synchronized across the team. Fully onsite and fully remote are both suboptimal.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- loco5niner 7y agoCan't you just go on your lunch? Or even just put an 'out-of-office' hour on your calendar?
- nostalgk 7y agoI work in a rural area, not in a city. No banks within lunch commute at all. All we really have is a Subway.
- loco5niner 7y agoThat's a reasonable reason. I would love more flexibility at my butts-in-seats company too, btw.