> The article discusses violating TOS, not a billing issue. That's not the impression I got. It sounds like the issue was that a account with misinterpreted pa

> The article discusses violating TOS, not a billing issue. That's not the impression I got. It sounds like the issue was that a account with misinterpreted payment history was showing bitcoin-mining-like usage patterns. Mining is not against the terms of use, they were just erroneously convinced themselves that the customer was not going to pay for it.